<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>brianhoppe.com</title>
	<link>http://www.brianhoppe.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the internet, life, and faith</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Why I Liked the Lost Premiere After Thinking About It</title>
		<link>http://www.brianhoppe.com/2006/why-i-liked-the-lost-premiere-after-thinking-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brianhoppe.com/2006/why-i-liked-the-lost-premiere-after-thinking-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bhoppe</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>TV</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianhoppe.com/2006/why-i-liked-the-lost-premiere-after-thinking-about-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by John Book
After rewatching the opening scene and
thinking through some things, I liked last night&#8217;s premiere.  I know some didn&#8217;t, so I thought I&#8217;d present the case:
1. It basically did the same thing last year&#8217;s premiere did&#8211;a) showed us a
bunch of new stuff that we don&#8217;t quite understand&#8211;and then explained much
of it within the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by John Book</p>
<p>After rewatching the opening scene and<br />
thinking through some things, I liked last night&#8217;s premiere.  I know some didn&#8217;t, so I thought I&#8217;d present the case:</p>
<p>1. It basically did the same thing last year&#8217;s premiere did&#8211;a) showed us a<br />
bunch of new stuff that we don&#8217;t quite understand&#8211;and then explained much<br />
of it within the next handful of episodes and b) set a tone/motif/theme for<br />
the season.  I think we got this last night&#8211;we don&#8217;t know what the Others<br />
are up to, but we see a glimpse of their real world that we don&#8217;t<br />
understand.</p>
<p>2. The conversation in the book club at the beginning contributed to that<br />
theme-setting, and I thought it was clever.  They&#8217;re arguing about whether<br />
the book they&#8217;ve read has any artistic merit or depth or whether it&#8217;s just a<br />
bunch of pointless sci-fi hooey.  Kind of like the show itself.  One<br />
question: why was Juliet crying at the very beginning&#8211;while looking in the<br />
mirror, playing the CD, and burning herself on the muffin pan?</p>
<p>3. Someone said, &#8220;This should have answered questions instead of posing new<br />
ones.&#8221;  Well, actually, I can&#8217;t think of any major questions left from the<br />
finale that I had.  I mean, we know what the Hatch does and that&#8217;s all done<br />
with.  The main questions (aside from the need for more info about Dharma) I<br />
would have would be &#8220;What&#8217;s up with the Others and how they work and what<br />
are their goals, etc.&#8221; and this show felt like the beginning of the<br />
answering of those questions.  Yeah, there are a lot of mysterious things<br />
still going one, but some of the answers you can intuit&#8211;remember the five<br />
research fields of Dharma?  Psychology, parapsychology, zoology, meterology,<br />
and electromagnetism?  We&#8217;ve seen most of these areas multiple times&#8211;and<br />
<script><!-- D(["mb","many of them last night. &amp;nbsp;Juliet uses psychology on Jack, and then he<br />
imagines his dad\'s voice coming from the speaker--but was that a<br />
hallucination or something psychic--and we\'ve seen the animal cages and in<br />
the past two seasons plenty to do with unusual weather and electromagnetism.<br />
So...I don\'t know, it\'s all there.</p>
<p>4. What was up with that boy, and why was he forced to apologize?  Just<br />
wondering.</p>
<p>Anyway, it wasn\'t perfect, in some ways it was frustrating, but I\'ve gone<br />
this far, and I trust that the writers weren\'t going, "Hmmm...let\'s make her<br />
cry for no reason, and Kate\'s wrist be all messed up for no reason, and<br />
Sawyer\'s short escape for no reason..."  I bet there are reasons.  And so I<br />
liked it.  So there.</div>
<p>&#8220;,0] ); D([&#8221;ce&#8221;]);  //&#8211;></script>many of them last night.  Juliet uses psychology on Jack, and then he<br />
imagines his dad&#8217;s voice coming from the speaker&#8211;but was that a<br />
hallucination or something psychic&#8211;and we&#8217;ve seen the animal cages and in<br />
the past two seasons plenty to do with unusual weather and electromagnetism.<br />
So&#8230;I don&#8217;t know, it&#8217;s all there.</p>
<p>4. What was up with that boy, and why was he forced to apologize?  Just<br />
wondering.</p>
<p>Anyway, it wasn&#8217;t perfect, in some ways it was frustrating, but I&#8217;ve gone<br />
this far, and I trust that the writers weren&#8217;t going, &#8220;Hmmm&#8230;let&#8217;s make her<br />
cry for no reason, and Kate&#8217;s wrist be all messed up for no reason, and<br />
Sawyer&#8217;s short escape for no reason&#8230;&#8221;  I bet there are reasons.  And so I<br />
liked it.  So there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.brianhoppe.com/2006/why-i-liked-the-lost-premiere-after-thinking-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
